Tuesday, September 16, 2008

McCain's Tampa Speech

This guy is bullshit. He's bitching about Lehman Bros. filing for Chapter 11, but he signed bills that were put into place, with the help of his buddy Phil Gramm, that assisted to put us into the lending crisis we're in right now.

Phil Gramm, by the way, is known as the Foreclosure King. Gramm, up until VERY recently, was McCain's financial adviser and is one of the leading people they're speculating to be the Treasury Secretary if McCain wins. This is NOT good stuff.

This is a paragraph I found on him:

  But Gramm's most cunning coup on behalf of his friends in the financial services industry—friends who gave him millions over his 24-year congressional career—came on December 15, 2000. It was an especially tense time in Washington. Only two days earlier, the Supreme Court had issued its decision on Bush v. Gore. President Bill Clinton and the Republican-controlled Congress were locked in a budget showdown. It was the perfect moment for a wily senator to game the system. As Congress and the White House were hurriedly hammering out a $384-billion omnibus spending bill, Gramm slipped in a 262-page measure called the Commodity Futures Modernization Act. Written with the help of financial industry lobbyists and cosponsored by Senator Richard Lugar (R-Ind.), the chairman of the agriculture committee, the measure had been considered dead—even by Gramm. Few lawmakers had either the opportunity or inclination to read the version of the bill Gramm inserted. "Nobody in either chamber had any knowledge of what was going on or what was in it," says a congressional aide familiar with the bill's history.

  Source: http://www.motherjones.com/news/feature/2008/07/foreclosure-phil.html



I don't like the prospect of Phil Gramm handling our Treasury. Nor do I like the cut of McCain's jib with regards to his response over Lehman Brothers or the rest of the lending market problems. He had a hand in deregulating it. That isn't to say that there weren't people from both sides with complicity in the matter...

We can look back and remember the Keating Five scandal from the Savings and Loan crisis in the 80s. Read this information... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keating_Five ... Five assholes all in a row, including another "American Hero," John Glenn.

He needs to be called on the floor for what he said today, really and truly. I'm a bit worked up about this because I had already been reading about Gramm and the other twenty lobbyists in McCain's employ, as well as the Keating Five stuff and McCain's association with lenders.

Reposted email from Mugsy

My friend Mugsy, who is on an email list with me, wrote the following. It hits the nail on the head.

I'm a little confused. Let me see if I have this straight . . .

* If you grow up in Hawaii , raised by your grandparents, you're 
"exotic, different."
* Grow up in Alaska eating mooseburgers, a quintessential American story.

* If your name is Barack you're a radical, unpatriotic Muslim.
* Name your kids Willow , Trig and Track, you're a maverick.

* Graduate from Harvard law School and you are unstable.
* Attend 5 different small colleges before graduating, you're well grounded.

* If you spend 3 years as a community organizer, become the first 
black President of the Harvard Law Review, create a voter 
registration drive that registers 150,000 new voters, spend 12 years 
as a Constitutional Law professor, spend 8 years as a State Senator 
representing a district with over 750,000 people, become
chairman of the state Senate's Health and Human Services committee, 
spend 4 years in the United States Senate representing a state of 13 
million people while sponsoring 131 bills and serving on the Foreign 
Affairs, Environment and Public Works and Veteran's Affairs 
committees, you don't have any real leadership experience.
* If your total resume is: local weather girl, 4 years on the city 
council and 6 years as the mayor of a town with less than 7,000 
people, 20 months as the governor of a state with only 650,000 
people, then you're qualified to become the country's second highest 
ranking executive.


* If you have been married to the same woman for 19 years while 
raising 2 beautiful daughters, all within Protestant churches, you're 
not a real Christian.
* If you cheated on your first wife with a rich heiress, and left 
your disfigured wife and married the heiress the next month, you're a 
good Christian.


* If you teach responsible, age appropriate sex education, including 
the proper use of birth control, you are eroding the fiber of society.
* If , while governor, you staunchly advocate abstinence only, with 
no other option in sex education in your state's school system while 
your unwed teen daughter ends up pregnant , you're very responsible.


* If your wife is a Harvard graduate lawyer who gave up a position in 
a prestigious law firm to work for the betterment of her inner city 
community, then gave that up to raise a family, your family's values 
don't represent America's.
* If your husband is nicknamed "First Dude", with at least one DWI 
conviction and no college education, who didn't register to vote 
until age 25 and once was a member of a group that advocated the 
secession of Alaska from the USA , your family is extremely admirable.


OK, that makes LOADS of sense.

Wednesday, October 31, 2007

Racist Row with Dr. Watson.

Once again, because the general populace cannot grasp a certain concept, we're seeing an uproar over a statement made by a scientist.

Watson, co-discoverer of the DNA double helix, said something rather haphazardly the other day in an interview with a British paper. While, I understand his point, the vast majority of people think what he was saying was patently racist. Let me try and boil this down to its bare and simple meaning.

Genes are not directly affected by environment, but environment weeds out certain genes by affecting their host. That is to say, it is not the environment which changes genes, but the reduction of a certain genetic expression due to environmental circumstances. For example, if there were a warren of rabbits living in Europe, a minority of which were genetically predisposed to tolerate cold, it stands to reason that if an ice age were to return, these would live, whereas the others would die out. But if a portion the non-cold resistant bunnies just happened to have a gene expressing white coats and the cold resistant bunnies were
all brown, the entire population would dwindle. If these were to ultimately mate, with luck, a group of cold-resistant white bunnies would emerge, and lo, they would weather the environment, that much stronger.

In essence, Watson is saying that due to circumstance and environment, certain genetic traits are not predominate in Africa. In this case, he is making the statement that Africa, by way of greed and corruption as well as isolation, health and other factors, is predisposed to foster a less intelligent human being. It is not to say that world wide, those of African descent are less intelligent. Personally, I differentiate the word African from black or from Afro-American. The same way I differentiate Spanish food (a generic term non-Spanish speaking people use for food from Spanish speaking countries) from say, Cuban food, Mexican food or food from Spain.  

Sadly, Watson cannot explain himself out of the situation he's in. The harder he tries, the worse it will get. He simply should not have made the statement at all. His best bet is to simply close his eyes, take a deep breath, and say... "I'm sorry." Those people with at least a cursory knowledge of genetics will say, "that's a shame," and move on. People who believe that he truly was saying, "gosh, them niggers is stupid," will continue to believe that he meant this by his statement. Then there are the rest of the masses who don't even know who Watson and Crick were. They'll just go back to their lattees and shut the door to their SUV, blasting the AC at full bore while bopping their head to whatever Clearchannel station they happen to be siphoning.

I see no hope in our future.

Wednesday, June 13, 2007

Full Disclosure.

I decided to publish the emails which our band members exchanged when the second Life of Pi incarnation broke up. There's now a third incarnation of the band. Be sure to read the Comments section below. One of the former band members chimed in... really funny!

--
john




Hey guys,

I think it comes as no surprise to any of us that Life of Pi is not the same band it was when it started. It's been a constantly evolving organism one that I have been happy to say that I have been a part of.

John, Anthony, and I joined the band about a year ago to take over for the departing members. The expectation being that it would be for a few shows and then we would decide what would happen. Since that time Anthony has departed our fair state, John has switched instruments, and we took on Mark as our new bassist. Aside from band members changes not much in the band has changed. We are still playing old Life of Pi songs that were written before John and I joined and have written no new material. I think there are a number of reasons for this but I think the #1 reason is communication. Or more to the point, lack thereof. For instance, practice times are rarely kept consistent and if they need to be cancelled it is usually with extremely short notice. There have been conversations between band members about other members behavior/performance but its rarely addressed to the member being spoken about. Generally speaking the feeling is that Life of Pi is Stephen's band and we are his "backup members". None of this is condusive to a collaborative song writing effort as a band.

Recently some events have occured that have also marred my experience with Life of Pi. Lily was nice enough to fill in for us when Mark was unable to attend our most recent show. She worked very hard to learn 7 songs in a VERY short time as a favor to us. At practice on Thursday Stephen was quite honestly a jerk to her. She was visibly upset at his treatment of her yet he still continued to treat her cruelly. Even when she left for the evening and John and I said thank you to her, Stephen did not even extend her that courtesy. This is only one instance of a personality trait that has come to light that I have a strong objection towards.

The other is Stephens myspace "habits". It seems that almost EVERY girl that I have introduced to Stephen has been approached by him on myspace. Not just normal friend requests, but near stalkerish bombardments of offers to go for drinks, to be their valentine etc. Not only was this innapropriate when he was dating Lily, it is kind of creepy when single as well and does not make for a fun playing environment when it gets to the point of being uncomfortable to introduce friends to my bandmates.

It has come to my attention by multiple members of the band that they are unhappy for various reasons be it the musicianship, songwriting, sobriety of band members, or just the general direction that the band is going. Based on this I have decided to part ways with Life of Pi. It is not an easy decision as I do love playing music. I do also love playing music with friends though and at this point, Life of Pi feels like bandmates, not friends. Since we have no further shows planned I am resigning now. If you would still like to put together the songs we have worked on and re-record the 2 we planned on doing I will be happy to help in any way.

-Andy



Stephen Hammill wrote:

Happy trails, man.

stephen hammill
www.myspace.com/lifeofpi




Right after this, I received the "gutless" text message and so responded with the following




Main Entry: gut·less
Pronunciation: 'g&t-l&s
Function: adjective
1 : lacking courage : COWARDLY
2 : lacking significance or vitality
- gut·less·ness noun

This is the word used to describe me today. In a text message.

I've been, for the last few months, very tight lipped about my feelings for this band. First and foremost, I was deferring to the judgment of my good friend Andy. Andy felt that if I said anything it would end up being caustic and pointed. My opinion is that people get away with too much because no one calls them out on things. Who is more correct? I don't think there's a right answer to that.

I have discussed this at length with my friends related to the band, specifically Andy and Anthony, though there were others. I've asked them to be discreet about it, a request which I obviously didn't have to make because of their character. I went to them because they understood the situation and could offer sound advice on what was happening.

For the most part, I have let Andy be my voice because it was felt I wouldn't handle the situation with kid gloves and because I trust him to be diplomatic about things.

Today, after being called gutless, especially in the face of so many past transgressions against us and people we know which warranted at least that level of insult has placed me in a position where I feel that not saying anything would be a greater mistake.

Let's start with the most recent. Last Monday, before leaving for Texas, I was kicked out of the band by you, Stephen. I know this because my friend, Andy, came and told me. Apparently you also discussed changing the band name as well as the line-up, getting rid of Marc and I and finding a new sound for your band.

Wonderful. Why? Because I had been trying to quit for quite some time. I stayed in the band out of friendship for Marc and Andy. People who I genuinely like for the qualities they engender. People who would have been put out had I simply walked off the scene.

The next most recent event was of course the two practices Lily so kindly joined us for, learning our songs as a FAVOR to us. Lily, I can't tell you how much I respect you and how grateful I am to you for playing with us, even after enduring the pure disrespect and lack of appreciation you got from Stephen. You are wonderful.

Stephen, you have no idea what it took for me to restrain myself that night. You might recall Andy shaking his head negatively in my direction then laughing? Its because I was mouthing to him that I was quitting the band. "I'm leaving!" or "I'm quitting!" were what I kept mouthing. What you probably also didnt realize was that by the second half of practice, there was no longer any protest from the battery.

Let me go back further. I'll leave it up to Andy to discuss your actions with Melissa. I will instead discuss your actions with my very, very close friend Linda. On your birthday, when you were hanging out with Lily at your house eating cake that she brought for you, you were discussing plans to go out with Linda to Ybor. Plans she thought I was in on. Yeah, your little lies got you in trouble.

When I got the message from her asking when I would be up there, I was perplexed. I consider Linda like a little sister, so when I heard what was going on, I grew extremely protective of her. Again, Stephen, your luck was with you.

She told me about you taking her out a few times in St. Pete earlier that week. She told me that you guys got drinks and so I asked if you drank anything, to which she said, "Nope. He just pretended to sip his beer now that you mention it."

Stephen, your actions towards our friends is incorrigible. They surpass sleaze and get near, by my definition, predation. Since Andy noted your transgressions while dating Lily, I'll simply skip over that.

Still, you call me gutless.

Frankly, the only thing I did related to digestion was to stomach your antics for so long. A mistake I won't make again because I know now that I was right about you from the moment we met.

So let's continue:

com·mu·ni·ca·tion
Pronunciation: k&-"myü-n&-'kA-sh&n
Function: noun
1 : an act or instance of transmitting
2 a : information communicated b : a verbal or written message
3 a : a process by which information is exchanged between individuals through a common system of symbols, signs, or behavior ; also : exchange of information

I'm defining words here for you because apparently while earning your degree in English or Literature or whatever, you misunderstood the meaning of said words.

There was zero communication. In fact, I can't remember the last time you even looked me in the eyes to say anything. You haven't voiced instructions to me since I played bass, aside from the initial learning period when I switched to guitar. You simply use avoidance and subterfuge to express your feelings. Sometimes on a small scale, by correcting a mistake Marc would make when in reality it was me who messed up. Sometimes on a large scale, by telling everyone but the band that you didn't like when Andy and I drank.

Seems to me that to fix a problem you need to address it, not be passive aggressive about it. Do you honestly believe that I did not know it pissed you off? Do you honestly believe that Andy and I getting trashed at the last show was unintentional? Hell no. We discussed and planned it ahead of time. In fact, it was our plan to get kicked out of the band rather than quit, making the whole decision a lot easier for you. Go ahead and confirm it with him.

Another example of your manipulation and lack of communication was the Reax interview. I love how we received the interview questions on the same morning they were to be delivered to Reax. Of course there was no time to use anything Andy, Anthony or I wrote, you'd sat on the questions for over a week. I won't even go into how I feel about Marc being given no chance to interact.

Moreover, the sheer number of rescheduled practices with little to no lead time, even after discussing this problem, was horrific.

Frankly, I could go on and on. You might ask why I stayed as long as I did. Two reasons: First, I enjoy playing live music. Second, I was friends with Anthony and Andy. You never really allowed for that.

Now go on and post your blogs, tell all your friends, make it known to all the people to whom your appearance matters how bad a person I was. Tell them all how terrible I am for doing what I did today on Myspace. You see, Stephen, I simply removed myself from your Myspace pages because I thought it better to fade out and go away, just like you wanted, rather than put you through the anguish and pain of telling me to my face that I was out of the band.

Yet I am gutless.

--
John.

P.S. -- Though not included in the emails addresses, I have copied this for Lily in MySpace because I didn't feel it was fair to talk about her behind her back, even if it was in good light.



One more from Andy, in response to "Happy Trails," which is followed by Stephen's only "Reply-All" response to the band.



Stephen,

Very mature response. I appreciate the thought, and
care that you put into it. It's now fairly obvious the
level of respect you had for our musicianship and for
our input in Life of Pi.

For the record, addressing this email to just myself
instead of the band (like I did) only furthers my
point about communication. This is precisely the type
of thing you do constantly so that nobody has any idea
what you are telling anybody else.

John was not "gutless" as you had the nerve to text
him today. He has been wanting to tell you off for
months now and quit however I asked him not to. I can
only wonder if the reasons Life of Pi is coming apart
now are the same reasons it fell apart before. I
certainly am not asking you if this is the case. I am
positive that you are incapable of giving an honest
answer to it anyway.

Stephen, you really need to do one or more of the
following:
a) Grow up
b) Seek counseling

I made an offer to assist with the recordings. I would
like to revoke that offer. Instead I would like to
make the PUBLIC request that those recordings never
see light of day. I think they are shit and unfit for
public consumption. They were recorded hastily simply
because of the situation. If I a not part of the band
I would rather not be associated wit h those
recordings. Thank you

Andy



Next, the only response we received from S.H. which was addressed to everyone ---



I can offer a response for public consumption if you wish. here it is:

Your behavior very recently has been unprofessional and disrespectful to the band, of which until very recently you were a member. It was dwarfed by the unprofessional and disrespectful behavior of John during his tenure in the band. His issues warranted being fired from the band, which was the next step that was to take place during the band meeting I had proposed, once everyone got back to town. Your behavior warranted a warning, which I gave you, along with the statement that you were welcome to remain in the band. That meeting now is moot, as you and John have decided to air dirty laundry.

I called John's actions gutless because that's what they were. He has lacked the gumption to approach me once to discuss any problems he might have had. If the reason for that comes from your intervention, then that is that. It changes nothing. He has a modicum of talent that is overshadowed by an alcoholic's passive/aggressive personality, which I don't really care about per se, as I'm concerned with band things, not your personal lives. However, in so much as it affects his stage presence, his ability to remember and repeat songs, and his behavior in practices and recording sessions, it is an issue. I wanted to see him get better at these things because I like John, but these things only continue and in some ways got worse.

As for your issues with me, your welcome to them. I make no apologies or excuses for the way I live my life, or how I run my band.

stephen hammill
www.myspace.com/lifeofpi



Things start getting very personal at this point.




"how I run my band."

Ahhhh you should have just responded with this simple line from the get go. It really sums things up.

Thanks for the clarification!

And unprofessional. I think not. If anything it has been the exact opposite. You shared with me that we are representatives of YOUR band even when we aren't playing. As if Life of Pi has a "moral code". If so, that moral code involves stalking my friends on myspace, cheating on your girlfriend with my friends, stealing from the band, and not being able to communicate properly with others. BRAVO my friend. You truly live the moral code of Life of Pi!

Andy.


Stephen Hammill wrote:


I'll take your request into consideration, RE: the recordings.


stephen hammill
www.myspace.com/lifeofpi
www.wmnf.org


Wow I really appreciate your "consideration". You can "consider" my request an INSISTENCE that you ditch the recordings. Or ditch my drums lines off the recordings and re-record them yourself. Maybe a drum machine would be more suitable though since it's obvious that's what you considered me anyway. Plus your timing.....not the best. I am near positive that John will feel the same about his part in the recording though we haven't really discussed it yet.

If you do chose to disregard my very insistent request I will be expecting a cut of money from every CD sold since you took it upon yourself to re-coupe your cost of recording by commandeering our pay from multiple shows without discussing it with the other members of your band. I could give a shit about the money... it's the principle.

Stephen you still really don't get it do you? Let me introduce you to a concept. It's called "reply all". Oh wait, I know for a fact you are familiar with it since you have used it in the past so you must just chose to use it selectively when it benefits you.

I have actually stood up for you and your actions for weeks now and you are only proving that I was wrong by the way you are handling this. And calling John gutless!? What do you call talking to me, telling me you want to kick him out of the band but never calling him to tell him? Rather you waited until I did which you knew I would.

Why bother asking you questions...... I'm sure I will only receive an answer like "we'll see buddy" or maybe "I'll let you know". For such a prolific writer Stephen, you seem to be having difficulty expressing yourself these days.

Andy


Only Andy is getting the responses, as he later points out



Stephen Hammill wrote:


Being in the band, there are no moral codes enforced, but there are criteria
for professional band behaviour.

The notion that I would steal money from the band is ridiculous and
unfounded.


stephen hammill
www.myspace.com/lifeofpi
www.wmnf.org


Andy's turn...


Reply all....still a difficult concept.

I would say that not notifying other members of payment for performances but rather pocketing said monies qualifies as stealing. You did not tell us of these activities until we approached you at which time you informed us you needed to cover the costs of recording. See how communication works? When you notify people about what is going on in a timely manner there is less confusion and therefore less likely hood of being called a thief. I would say lesson learned yet I somehow doubt it.

As far as band behavior. If anything, I was always professional. At no time did my drinking impair me from playing. Even at my most drunk I performed better than you at your most sober. Not one show has passed since our inception into the band that people did not come up to us after and either tell us how much better Life of Pi is since John, Anthony, and I joined or that we would be great if not for your off key singing and quasi rock star attitude.

And you are right. Moral codes were not enforced in the band.....oh except your not wanting us to drink. Moral codes however shouldn't have to be spoken when it comes to respect between friends and you sire, have shown very little.

Andy.


I finally weigh in again, for the last time



Blessed be. May the heavens shine upon us. When the creature gets backed into a corner and confronted, its claws come out. Funny that there is no longer anything to lose.

Its really unnecessary for me to repeat points in my last email, as I believe I articulated very well how I felt. It also came to light in Andy's emails that I had been wishing to express this for a while. I can see your critical reading skills are honed as you have given these points a slight nod of acknowledgment.

I'm loathe to point out the following item out to you for fear that you may indeed utilize them in the future and extend the suffering of any band mates you may trick into joining a project with you. Regardless, here it is:

BANDS HAVE MULTIPLE PEOPLE IN THEM. BANDS ARE NOT ONE PERSON.

Bands collaborate to create music. Unless you think of yourself as some sort of musical genius, I can't see how this doesn't make sense to you. Seriously though, man... you and Phil Collins could probably be great buds. Why don't you just start a solo career and sing "come on, boys" all you like. Who knows, maybe your request will be fulfilled.

I wrote my gutless response to you previously using facts and real opinions from real people. Things that could be backed up by asking the individuals I mentioned. You, on the other hand, are feckless and inconsiderate.

Tit for tat, my email will be personal.

Your band. Take it. Have fun with your sappy songs and lyrics that give teen agers mooney eyes. Enjoy your formulaic chord progressions and weak guitar solos. Continue honking that terrible sound through your pathetic sounding multi-effects processor. Really, I cannot be any more serious when I say this: I have never heard anything ruin the sound of a Telecaster or an Ampeg more effectively. You've single handedly sullied the name of both.

By the way, I think in your second to last sentence the word you were aiming for was the contraction of "you" and "are." On your latest lame poem on myspace, the word is "pore," not "pour."

Since we're stooping to low levels, I figure that poking at grammar and spelling are about as childish and pointless as anything. I didn't wish to be outdone. Feel free to poke at mine, but remember who received a degree related to language and who did not.

Finally, I issue this warning. Touch one of my friends again and I will "touch" you in ways you'll remember for quite some time. Speak to one of my friends in the same manner which you spoke with Lily and the same holds true. Don't darken my path.

You are exactly the type of person I despise. You are hollow. You have a forked tongue and speak from two mouths. You have three hearts if you have one at all: One you expose to the world, one you keep to yourself and the one which you don't even admit to. You lie because it is your nature. You've been doing it since you were at Jesuit. One of my oldest friends knows you quite well, but I will not drag him into this muckraking out of respect to him.

The only thing I wish for your future is that you either get professional help for your problems or that you get caught by some authority: either one will get you to stop. Its your choice which.

I shall not respond again. Its a waste of my time.



finally, our estranged friend puts in his two cents.



Hey guys,

Just thought I'd voice some of my opinions before I
hit the sack.

- I always liked the music/lyrics in Life of Pi
- I really loved playing live with you guys; I always
had a great time, even when the wheels were
threatening to come off
- the recordings that were done at my house are, to
me, a document of a time that I spent with you guys
(and in Tampa) and thus have special meaning to me,
and I'm sorry that my leaving caused us to rush
through it. I would have loved to have given it the
time and attention it needed, but, that said, I'd
still like to have that document in some form
- further, I feel that a lot of those recordings were
collaborative, at least in the creation of them. I
never felt like my ideas were shot down, not even when
they were outlandish. The time schedule was difficult
and meant that Stephen and myself were the most
involved - again, my fault. If we had had another few
months, or a permanent place to record (without police
intervention), I think everyone would have been
thrilled with the results.

It seems like a lot has gone down since I left, and so
I can't comment on that. Sorry to see you guys part
ways, but it's probably for the best.

I know I always seem to be the diplomatic one - that's
just my nature. In some ways you could say I'm Jerry,
and you guys are George and Elaine.

Comments welcome...

Anthony

Friday, April 13, 2007

Holocaust at a hollow cost.

I received an email from my mother this morning which set me off. This is my response. The original email is below my rant.


-------------------------------------------------------
I quote from the email sent to me, "Iran among others."

Yes, Iran is doing this. Yes, its a travesty that they are claiming that the holocaust never happened. Yes, the cartoon is poignant and chilling.

What I don't believe is that the author of the cartoon, Wiley Miller, would like his cartoon being forwarded around with the same sort of nationalist and facist rhetoric that Hitler or Mussolini would have used. "A rose by any other name..."

I also believe that there is duality in Wiley's comic strip. He isn't simply referring to the Holocaust but is also warning us of an ominous future if we continue to follow blindly the leaders who would have us go to war at any cost.

The comic strip says, "Imagine yourself in a land where your fellow countrymen followed the voice of political extremists who didn't like your religion."

Well, today in this country, the religion is generalized Islam and the extremists are right wing Dominionists. Perhaps the scope is different across the ocean, but we are not there... we are here. Think of the axiom "Keep your friends close and your enemies closer," or "Know your enemy." That in mind, the best way to describe our situation was stated by Mussolini himself: "Facism is the perfect marriage of Corporation and State."

Think about the actions our government takes, think hard about what it will and will not do based upon the actions and will of its financial backing. Consider the interests of the corporations and parallel those wills with the action or inaction of our leaders. PACs do more than we're willing to see and yet all we need to do is look.

Sorry if you don't like my views, but I'm tired of being bombarded by propaganda like this. I despise it when something good is marred by subversive intentions. This comic strip said enough standing on its own without the commentary. If you like this sort of stuff, go watch Fox News.

--
j.k.k.


CSK wrote:



----- Original Message -----

*From:* VS

*To:* VNK

*Sent:* Thursday, April 12, 2007 1:47 PM

*Subject:* Fwd: MEMORIAM



Begin forwarded message:

Please read the little cartoon carefully. It's powerful. Then read the comments at the end, and please - forward it! We cannot, we must not, ever forget what happened in Europe over 60 years ago, because it could happen again. Anyone, any group, could be the target. It has been said that those who refuse to study history are doomed to repeat it. In this case, those who are attempting to rewrite history are probably planning to repeat it! The hatred is already there, in place, taught to the children from infancy, with promises of glory and honor to those who carry out the plans. Forewarned is forearmed, and I'm doing my small part by forwarding this message. I hope you'll do the same


*In Memoriam*




It is now more than 60 years after the Second World War in Europe ended. This e-mail is being sent as a memorial chain, in memory of the six million Jews, million Russians, 10 million Christians and 1,900 Catholic priests who were murdered, massacred, raped, burned, starved and humiliated with the German and Russian peoples looking the other way!



Now, more than ever, with Iran, among others, claiming the Holocaust to be "a myth," it is imperative to make sure the world never forgets, because the Islamo-Facists want to do it again.



This e-mail is intended to reach 40 million people worldwide!


Join us and be a link in the memorial chain and help us distribute it around the world.
Please send this e-mail to 10 people you know and ask them to continue the memorial chain.
*Please don't just delete it. It will only take you a minute to pass this along - Thanks!*

Labels:

Tuesday, March 20, 2007

The Never Answered Questions

I am essentially pasting the contents of an email I sent to the other members of the band in response to questions given to the lead singer of my ex-band. This is funny, but when I get permission from the drummer to post his, you will laugh harder at his answers.



1. What would you say is your sound?

John: Gay mixed with hetero. Sort of like Liberace meets Malkmus and they have a Bailey's Irish Cream drinking baby named Old Gregg blessed and cursed with a man-gina. BEIGE-O-LICIOUS!


Andy: Mix pixies, pavement, and luna together, stir the pot
with a big gay stick, add a pretentious name and BAM!
You have life of Pi



2. How has living in Florida influenced your band?


AndyWe wear shorts more often then say if we lived in the
northeast. As a drummer it leads to better
ventillation in the crotch region allowing for me to
play more comfortably


John: Florida has lowered my standards and broken my will.

3. What can you say about the Tampa music scene?

John: Thanks to the efforts of Reax, AES and New Granada (in no particular order), Tampa's music scene is expanding again. Between the late 90s and early 2000s, the scene was pretty dead. Now bands like Zillionaire, Roppongi's Ace, and The Diviners just to name a few can play and actually draw crowds. It seems that people are beginning to appreciate music again. MTV and Clear Channel are losing some hold.


AndyIt's improving day by day due to the efforts of Reax
magazine, AES, Tastemakers events etc. There are some
great bands in Tampa and I think the quality of the
bnds makes people more excited about not just going
out to see cover bands.



4. Who have been some of your influences on the band (both musically and otherwise)?

John: I have various influences: Greg Dulli, Calla, The Gospel Swingers, Luna, Muddy and the Wolf... I'm all over the place.


Andy: Personally speaking I would say my influences are
bands like Pavement, Pixies, and Velvet Underground.
Band wise I think we are influenced by whatever answer
stephen gives.


5. Where are some of your favorite places to play in Tampa?


Andy: New World Brewery hands down. I love the vibe there
and the fact that it's one of few venues people come
to on a consistant basis to see local bands.



John: There aren't many... New World Brewery is killer for being outside and for the crowd it draws. Crowbar is an amazing mid-sized indoor venue which fills the void of the Masquerade.

6. What can listeners expect from "Monsoon Season"?

John: More of the same except a little different.


Andy: I don't know....ask Stephen I still haven't really
heard it


7. I'm assuming that your band name stems from the novel by Yann Martel. What from this book has helped you to reaching the name of your band?

John: The title.


Andy: Yann Martel called Stephen and said, "I hear you are
looking for a pretentious band name. I have a very
popular book that is destined to become a huge movie
therby destroying any indie rock credibility you may
have once possesed. How would you feel about the name
life of pi?" Stephen accepted and the rest is history



8. Why is music your artistic outlet?


Andy: Ultimately when the day is over I can't imagine loving
anything more than playing music. The idea of
expressing myself any other way has never even dawned
on me.


9. What separates Life of Pi from other local bands?

John: You mean aside from its formulaic chord patterns and uninteresting lyrics? I would say probably the mediocre solos (Splendor Music not withstanding) and off key singing.


Andy: I think are sound seperates us from most bands. What I
mean is that they hear us once, and want to play
seperately from us from that point on.



10. Is there anything you want potential listeners to know about your band?


Andy: If you're female and on myspace you'll be hearing from
Stephen soon


John: Run. Hide.

Tuesday, March 13, 2007

LOPpy Seconds

How do you like your rock and roll served? Clammy and limp or standing up for itself? For the last year I've been involved in a rather flaccid excuse for a rock band. I've been told that I'm going to be kicked out. Why? My antics! I am apparently too drunk on stage. Man, you'd drink too if your front man wore beads, pink shirts and glitter and had lyrics like, “Come on boys.”

Time and time again I've heard from people, “You guys would rock if it weren't for your singer.” Frankly, the only one in the band not in on the jokes is the singer himself. Every one of us has laughed at the situation while conversing over drinks but for the singer.

I joined this band as a favor. When we first came in, there was talk of it being temporary but one show led to the next. Early on, we were simply excited to play for crowds again. But listening to your gut is usually good advice, because even back then we got telling responses from people: “Wow, you guys are a lot more animated than the old line-up.”

Its true though, I saw the old band. They stood on stage like statues. There was no interaction, movement, excitement or intensity. There was simply motion. Like the band at Chuck E. Cheese: Glorified animatronics. Automatons replaying the already recorded material note for note with little deviance or improvisation. Likely they were having the same experience I was.

Why then did this continue? Well, none of the new members felt like they had a right to give input, at least at first. None of us knew the material and so the focus was on learning the nuances. Hints would pop up here and there of the storm to come. One missed note, in key or not, and the whole castle would tumble. Unless of course it was with me, and then there would be silence and avoidance. Rarely would I be told, “that's not right,” if I were off. Perhaps I engendered that attitude, but I'm a rather willing and capable learner.

As time went on, we recorded an album. An album written before we were members. An album envisioned recorded without any effort to become intimate with the songs. An album recorded because we had a place to do it, even if it wasn't the right time.

As time went by, the line-up changed we shuffled things around. I was playing bass at the beginning and frankly it was boring. No dynamics at all. My deviance wasn't appreciated either. Whenever I would change something even a little, just to riff here or there, I would be told, “No, the part actually goes like this.”

So, one of our members left us to go to the great North. We were left with a void which precipitated a need for a new member. Our choices were a pompous asshole from another band whose personality rivaled that of an unruly earthworm, an unknown girl and a guy with a bass and a practice space.

I expressed my wish to move to the guitar spot and we all discussed the benefits of having a permanent place to practice our music. The guy with the bass and a space was ultimately chosen, and in retrospect, it was a great choice. He fit into the fold well.

Time went by, things went as normal: Learn this this way. Don't deviate. I would and then be told to change. Mostly I just did what I wanted anyhow. If we couldn't contribute to the song writing we could at least contribute to the way songs were played. The drummer did in kind, though his changes were more up front. I'm told I should have expressed my wish to do things, but as I look back, I think I did just fine. The new songs which were most often liked by people were given changes from the versions we recorded on the album.

Our lead singer, who you must all surely know because he likes to ask his bandmate's MySpace friends out for “drinks” even though he himself only pretends to sip the beer, worked tirelessly on the album. Changing things here, injecting things there, augmenting his off key vocals and asking for advice he didn't really care to hear. We planned “meetings” so we could listen to the material but only had one. We, who were supposed to be part of the group, were relegated to back-up band. Essentially we were playing covers of our own music.

Man, this sounds like a VH1 special.

Several months ago I expressed to our “metronome” I was getting tired of things. I said I wanted to leave but I was persuaded to stay. He and I are great friends, you can't ask for a better person to play in a band with. In truth, I really wanted to continue to play live, even though it was kind of embarrassing.

Our first show of 2007 was actually the first installment in what was to be the trilogy of my final shows. (I just wanted to use the word “trilogy” because I've been playing Lego Star Wars lately.) It shall go down in history as “The Glitter Incident.” Personally, I thought it was sweat, but Metronome called him out. It wasn't taken well.

To everyone we know, we became an inside joke which we hid from the singer, though not with much effort. When a local magazine sent us an email interview recently, the rest of the band was given only a day to answer the questions, though we weren't told it needed to be returned immediately, so we all took our time. Only after we sent each other hilariously funny responses to the questions did the drummer send back his real responses to our singer. The singer simply said, “Oh, I don't we have time to send them. I'll just send my responses.” Standard, expected response. To my knowledge, our bassist wasn't even given the opportunity to look at the questions.

I'll probably post my comical responses to the magazine interview later, and if the drummer allows me too, I'll post his because I think they're even funnier than my own.

About two weeks ago, I expressed to the drummer that I was going to quit the band. He asked me to give it one more chance and I conceeded. Last week, we were given less than 5 days notice that our bassist wasn't going to make it to the show with Earl Greyhound and Dirty on Purpose, two relatively large acts who put on amazing shows. At first I was angry, but the bassist had little choice in the matter as he was going on tour with one of his other bands. Being on the road for ten days with guys mad at you for screwing up a tour would be uncomfortable to say the least.

So we racked our brains for a solution. We had a few choices: cancel the show, play without a bassist, or find someone who'd be willing to learn a set with us and play a show. Immediately I thought of several people who played guitar and had the skill. We went with one person who was close with the singer and she was given 7 songs to play.

So, with three days to go, her induction began: Wednesday, she had a private session with the singer which the drummer and I did not attend. Thursday, our normal practice day, we got together as a whole and practiced the short set list. Seven of our own and one cover. By the end of the first hour of practice, our stand-in bassist was markedly upset. The singer was treating her like shit. I kept mouthing to our drummer “I'm gonna quit,” and “I'm quitting,” to which he just laughed and shook his head. In reality I was only partly joking at this point, but the way our stand-in bassist was being treated by the singer was really pissing me off. She was doing US a favor. She had only learned the songs the night before... her mistakes were very, VERY, acceptible and to be honest, she did a damned good job. Still, she was berated and mistreated.

I debated playing the show and simply saying, “Thanks a lot, everybody. This was my last show.” I was told this wasn't exactly the best thing to do, though at the time only a handful of people knew the whole story. Frankly, I think that would have been a better route than writing this.

So, Friday rolls around and we have another pre-show practice. The drummer and I decide to get trashed for the show. We hit the “Beautiful Smoke” bar across the street from the venue and have several shots of whiskey and then head back to the venue.

We set up and start the show. My customized telecaster I'm playing through is singing sweet tones through the vintage '65 Gibson Minuteman I'm playing through. I'm an equipment snob and always look for a better sound. The singer's guitar is honking out its typically terrible tone. This is the second most common complaint I hear behind his terrible voice. I have my flask of vodka and two cans of Wittekerke sitting on the speaker next to me, easily within my grasp and in plain view of the singer. He loathes me at this point. I don't trust anyone who doesn't drink or doesn't have sideburns.

On the third song I switch to my vintage Epiphone Wilshire. I overload the pickups with my fuzz pedal and the speakers spill out that beautiful crackle of distortion. And shoes. Wait. No, that was just the drummer throwing his footwear at me.

Its on! I'm at a serious tactial disadvantage being up front and having my back to the battery. A while later, a drum stick whizzes past my head and strikes a girl on the foot. This is getting dangerous! I motion for her to throw it back to me at which point I catch the returned stick and start playing the guitar with it by using it as a surrogate pick. After a bit I toss it over my shoulder and it bounces harmlessly by the drummer.

Another song trundles by and we begin to play again. The drummer calls me over and I so I comply. Beer fountain! A spray of suds flies in my face and past me. I'm sure some hits the singer. I'm sure he hates it. More loathing? God, I hope so.

Why I keep letting my guard down, I can't say, but on the next song I'm facing the audience again. I turn around and I see something hurtling towards me. Pure cat-like reflexes save me. I catch the newly flung drumstick deftly between my middle and ring fingers on my strumming hand without losing my pick. In the same motion as its caught, I rotate my wrist and whip it back sideways at the drummer. It nearly misses his head and bounces off the wall behind him.

The show ends with a blasphemous rendition of a Pavement song. I hate covering the same song twice, especially two shows in a row. Even worse than that, I hate to commit heresy towards a band I love. Whatever though, at least I can say that the last song I played was great, even though its execution was lame.

The night ends with the singer hanging out with yet another one of the people he stalks on MySpace. He didn't even give us a look of disdain. I have nothing but contempt for this punk-ass.

The weekend goes by and there's nary a word. I discuss the situation and recount the story to our friend in the North, the ex-band member. He laughs reservedly but I have a feeling he doesn't really believe everything which has transpired.

Monday afternoon rolls around and the drummer says he has a few things to tell me. Apparently the singer has made it clear that I am to be kicked out of the band along with the bassist who is on tour right now. Nice welcome home present for when he returns.

The singer wants to reform the band with a new name and image and a new lease on music. Right.

Le band est mort. Vive le band.

Wednesday, August 30, 2006

Repost from my other blog

I've been slacking. I'm pasting a little tidbit I wrote at http://forced-dumb.blogger.com/.

Thursday, February 02, 2006

reply to my mom.

My mom, who happens to believe she is a Republican, sent this to me:
http://www.huppi.com/kangaroo/8Comparison.htm
I responded with the following:

I finally got a chance to look at this.

Given the figures, what are your thoughts? Why do you think we are so far behind in so many things? Taking into account the exponential rate of decay shown in those figures, at what point do you think we will reach a point of no return... or have we already reached that point?

Look at the murder rate. That figure alone makes my stomach flutter. Why are we so barbaric here? Certainly its not because we are allowed to own guns... Canada is allowed to own guns, but they are only at 1/1000th of our murder rate. Its not the population level, otherwise Europe with its 500+ million people would score much higher.

Do you understand what I mean when I say to you that this country makes me sick? We had the potential to be the greatest in everything we did, but its been wasted. We're not taken seriously in anything we do, but everyone wants to be our friend because we have money. No one believes that we have the world's interest in mind when we embark on any international effort. Nothing we do holds any real water in the eyes of the rest of the world.

I think we took it for granted. We allowed the freedom which we were given... no, the freedom which we WON; a thing we considered our most treasured asset, and turned it into our greatest failure.

When I see political emails from either side blaming one another for the problems, I want to scream. How can anyone really care about such things when they fly in the face of figures such as these? When you hear our President say things like, "people who don't want to fight the war in Iraq are isolationists," do you think he really understands what that sentence means? Even if we weren't in Iraq, we are the farthest thing in this world from being "isolationist." We export our "morals" by building sweat shops in impoverished countries so basketball players can get sponsored by shoe companies and we pay poor natives to strip the rain forests to make grazing land for cattle so fast food companies can turn around and sell hamburgers which end up turning us into overweight beasts.

What makes me even more sad is when I see intelligent people swayed by the rhetoric our media and politicians spout. When I hear people ape the words of their chosen political party simply because it is what they "should do," it makes me want to grab them and shake them until they open their eyes and the cotton falls out of their ears. People need to shut the big hole in the front of their face and open up the two small ones on the side.

I wonder all the time what can be done to fix these things. But then I look at figures like those that you sent me... and my shoulders sag and I wonder if there is a point. Why try? Its a lost cause now. No one hears reason. No one listens to their gut. Too few people are angry for the right reasons. The worst crime of all is that for all of our freedom of speech, not one single word can be heard above the din.

Ten years. We'll be in dire economic straights and we'll still be fighting "the war on terror" having gained nothing but more enemies.

I hope my prediction is wrong.

--
j.k
posted by ghx at 9:06 PM 0 comments